Wine people have a love-hate relationship with blind tastings.
Imagine voluntarily participating in an activity that could publicly reveal you've spent the last twenty years being confidently wrong.
That's a blind tasting.
For those unfamiliar, a blind tasting is exactly what it sounds like. The labels are hidden, the bottles are disguised, and the wine must survive on personality alone. There is no impressive price tag or the opportunity to casually mention that the bottle costs more than somebody's monthly rent.
In 1976 a group of French judges sat down in Paris expecting to evaluate some very respectable wines. The tasting was organised by Steven Spurrier, a British wine merchant who wanted to showcase California wines alongside some of France's most celebrated bottles.
Now, I need you to understand something. Nobody thought California was going to win. Because California was California. And France was France.
One was a promising young wine region.The other had spent centuries building a reputation so powerful that entire wine lists were organized around it.
The tasting included some serious names. This is also a list that will make my wine nerdy friends happy -
On the white wine side, California sent wines from Chateau Montelena, Chalone, Spring Mountain Vineyard, Freemark Abbey, and David Bruce.
France responded with some of Burgundy's most respected producers - Domaine Roulot Meursault Charmes. Joseph Drouhin Beaune Clos des Mouches. Domaine Ramonet-Prudhon Bâtard-Montrachet. Domaine Leflaive Puligny-Montrachet Les Pucelles.
On the red wine side, California brought wines from Stag's Leap Wine Cellars, Ridge, Heitz, Clos du Val, Freemark Abbey, and Mayacamas.
France arrived with some of Bordeaux's most prestigious names. Château Mouton Rothschild. Château Montrose. Château Haut-Brion. Château Léoville Las Cases
In other words, this was not David versus Goliath.This was David accidentally finding himself on the guest list and trying not to spill anything.
When the tasting began, things became awkward.
The first major surprise came from Chardonnay. Which feels deeply on-brand for Chardonnay.
Cabernet Sauvignon gets all the attention in Napa today. Cabernet is the tall, mysterious person at the bar everyone pretends not to stare at.
Chardonnay is the opposite. It's the jack of all trades who doesn't know that it's the jack of all trades. Chardonnay loves to be experimented with - lees aging, stainless steel ferment, oak barrels, concrete - Chardonnay is a friend that says yes to everything.
And in that room, it was Chateau Montelena's 1973 Chardonnay that topped the white wine rankings.
Then came the Cabernet Sauvignon. And honestly, if you're going to start a revolution, Cabernet Sauvignon is an excellent accomplice.
Because Cabernet absolutely adores Napa Valley.
The grape thrives in warm, sunny climates, and Napa gives it exactly what it wants. Long growing seasons. Plenty of sunshine. Cool evenings that help preserve freshness and balance.
It's a little like watching somebody date their perfect match.
The chemistry is obvious.
The valley's diverse soils, elevations, and microclimates only make things more interesting. A Cabernet from Rutherford behaves differently than one from Oakville. Mountain Cab from Howell is distinct from the Mountain Cab from Spring Mountain.
It's an entire cast of personalities. Which is probably why wine people become so insufferable when discussing it.
Every time you think you've figured Napa out, another vineyard appears and politely informs you that you have, in fact, not.
When the red wine scores were tallied, Stag's Leap Wine Cellars' 1973 Cabernet Sauvignon finished ahead of some of Bordeaux's most celebrated wines.
And just like that, wine history changed. But again, Napa didn't actually become better that afternoon. The vineyards didn't suddenly improve or the winemakers didn't magically learn new tricks.
Except, people’s attention narrowed down to it.
Which, if we're being honest, is the entire plot of a hot girl summer.
One day you're the exact same person you've always been.
The next day everyone suddenly notices.
The Judgment of Paris tasting 1976 ( as they lovingly call it ), in my humble opinion, wasn't important because California beat France.
That's the version people remember, but it's not the version I love.
What I love is what the tasting proved.
Great wine could come from places that weren't supposed to make the world's greatest wine.
A reputation could be challenged.
A hierarchy could be questioned.
And a blind tasting could force people to fall in love with what was actually in the glass instead of what they expected to find there.
Honestly, there's probably a life lesson in that somewhere.
But wine people are dramatic enough already.
For now, let's simply say this:
Napa's hot girl summer started in 1976.
Add comment
Comments